The pursuit of justice within a political party is not just for the candidates; it’s a battle for the soul of every voter’s franchise. The recent move by Kasipul parliamentary aspirant Charles Ogada to seek the nullification of the ODM nomination results is more than a personal grievance—it’s a litmus test for the Orange Democratic Movement’s commitment to its own principles.
Ogada’s petition, filed with the party’s disputes tribunal, alleges a series of familiar yet serious irregularities that have long plagued Kenyan party primaries. Reports from his camp point to issues like:
-
Inconsistent voter registers: Allegations of missing names and inclusion of unverified voters.
-
Intimidation of agents: Preventing effective oversight at the polling stations.
-
Questionable result transmission: Discrepancies between forms filled at the polling station and those announced at the tallying center.
For the ordinary voter in Kasipul, these are not just technicalities. When the process is questionable, the winner’s legitimacy remains forever clouded. This creates apathy and disillusionment, making voters feel that their role is merely ceremonial.
Why This Case Resonates Beyond Kasipul
The ODM party has long branded itself as a bastion of democracy and the “people’s party.” How it handles this internal dispute will send a powerful signal.
-
A Transparent Process: A swift, fair, and transparent hearing by the ODM tribunal will strengthen the party’s brand and reassure its supporters.
-
A Swept-Under-the-Rug Approach: Dismissing the petition without a credible investigation will reinforce the narrative that party primaries are “foregone conclusions,” damaging voter turnout and enthusiasm in the general election.
The people of Kasipul, and indeed all Kenyans watching, deserve to know that the candidate who emerges is the true choice of the people, not a product of a flawed system. Charles Ogada’s petition is a courageous demand for accountability. How the ODM responds will reveal its true character.
